Ryzen 5 2400G vs 1600X
Description
Both models 2400G and 1600X are based on Zen architecture.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
800f11
Core
Raven Ridge
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
173.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.95k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
18.36k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.39k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
17.35k (x5.48)
TOTAL
29.52k
45.06k (x1.53)
Multithread
2400G
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
19.47k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
77.19k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
15.4k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
12.25k (x4.06)
TOTAL
122.2k
124.3k (x1.02)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
14.63k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
24.09k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.51k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
15.86k (x3.06)
TOTAL
47.96k
60.09k (x1.25)
Multithread
2400G
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
48.75k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
80.1k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
24.5k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
19.85k (x3.55)
TOTAL
198.27k
173.2k (x0.87)
Performance/W
2400G
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
1823 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4