Ryzen 5 2400G vs FX 9590
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
600f20
Core
Raven Ridge
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
65 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
11.51k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
9.57k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
4.19k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
7.14k (x2.1)
TOTAL
44.15k
32.41k (x0.73)
Multithread
2400G
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
55.13k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
51.69k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
27.02k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
3.81k (x1.25)
TOTAL
188.49k
137.65k (x0.73)
Performance/W
2400G
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
869 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
2900 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5731 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
871 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
11321 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4