Ryzen 5 2400G vs A9 9420
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.3 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.3 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
670f00
Core
Raven Ridge
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
46.33k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
2.56k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
9.97k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
2.96k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
2.12k (x0.67)
TOTAL
29.52k
17.61k (x0.6)
Multithread
2400G
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
3.88k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
9.26k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
3.9k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
1.74k (x0.58)
TOTAL
122.2k
18.79k (x0.15)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
8.41k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
11.48k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
3.29k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
2.24k (x0.74)
TOTAL
43.01k
25.41k (x0.59)
Multithread
2400G
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
11.25k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
13.69k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
2.09k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
1.87k (x0.63)
TOTAL
183.04k
28.89k (x0.16)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
7.55k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
13.9k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
3.11k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
2.18k (x0.64)
TOTAL
44.15k
26.74k (x0.61)
Multithread
2400G
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
9.09k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
12.25k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
3k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
1.81k (x0.59)
TOTAL
188.49k
26.15k (x0.14)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
11.74k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
16.05k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
3.26k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
2.05k (x0.4)
TOTAL
47.96k
33.09k (x0.69)
Multithread
2400G
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
18.57k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
20.11k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
5.27k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
2.38k (x0.43)
TOTAL
198.27k
46.33k (x0.23)
Performance/W
2400G
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
352 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
159 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
3089 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
3260 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
905 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
570 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
9192 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4