Ryzen 5 2400G vs A10 5745M
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 5745M is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the 5745M gets 37.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 5.1 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the 5745M gets 37.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 5.1 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
610f31
Core
Raven Ridge
Richland
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket FP2
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2018
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
17.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
37.11k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
6.66k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
5.63k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
2.4k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
2.39k (x0.7)
TOTAL
44.15k
17.08k (x0.39)
Multithread
2400G
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
13.55k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
13.9k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
6.75k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
2.91k (x0.96)
TOTAL
188.49k
37.11k (x0.2)
Performance/W
2400G
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
869 points/W
542 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
556 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
2900 points/W
1484 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
2297 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5731 points/GHz
1941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
828 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
871 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
11321 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4