Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i7-1165G7
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806c1
Core
Raven Ridge
Tiger Lake-UP3
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
210.4k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
4.26k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
19.54k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
10.95k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
11.08k (x3.5)
TOTAL
29.52k
45.84k (x1.55)
Multithread
2400G
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
15.69k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
68.3k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
33.66k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
12.16k (x4.03)
TOTAL
122.2k
129.81k (x1.06)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
14.48k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
24.18k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
11.95k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
11.01k (x3.64)
TOTAL
43.01k
61.62k (x1.43)
Multithread
2400G
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
50.98k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
80.7k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
36.61k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
12.02k (x4.04)
TOTAL
183.04k
180.32k (x0.99)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
16.27k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
25.74k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
11.5k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
10.82k (x3.18)
TOTAL
44.15k
64.32k (x1.46)
Multithread
2400G
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
54k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
88.76k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
35.23k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
12.14k (x3.99)
TOTAL
188.49k
190.12k (x1.01)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
22.97k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
21.61k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
8.99k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
8.52k (x1.65)
TOTAL
47.96k
62.1k (x1.29)
Multithread
2400G
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
82.75k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
86.58k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
29.34k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
11.72k (x2.1)
TOTAL
198.27k
210.4k (x1.06)
Performance/W
2400G
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
7514 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4