Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-11300H
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.4 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.4 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806c1
Core
Raven Ridge
Tiger Lake H35
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
285.75k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
25.83k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
23.56k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
9.2k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
5.06k (x0.98)
TOTAL
47.96k
63.64k (x1.33)
Multithread
2400G
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
116.87k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
121.08k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
41.8k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
6k (x1.07)
TOTAL
198.27k
285.75k (x1.44)
Performance/W
2400G
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
8164 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4