| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i9-9900KF


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 592.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 3.4 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
906ed
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
84.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
592.86k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
33.03k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
29.52k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
6.55k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
15.45k (x0.97)
TOTAL
60.09k
84.54k (x1.41)

Multithread

1600X

i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
276.22k (x5.67)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
250.61k (x3.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
57.2k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
8.84k (x0.45)
TOTAL
173.2k
592.86k (x3.42)

Performance/W
1600X
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
2908 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
2638 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
6241 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
6605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
3090 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
16909 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4