| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i9-10980XE


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 7.2 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
50657
Core
Summit Ridge
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
18/36
TDP
95 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
25344 kB
Date
April 2017
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
1241.12k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
4.52k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
17.94k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.5k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
9.64k (x0.56)
TOTAL
45.06k
37.6k (x0.83)

Multithread

1600X

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
84.93k (x4.36)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
409.55k (x5.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
122.88k (x7.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
22.12k (x1.81)
TOTAL
124.3k
639.48k (x5.14)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
29.53k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
22.59k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
5.99k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
10.22k (x0.64)
TOTAL
60.09k
68.33k (x1.14)

Multithread

1600X

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
587.06k (x12.04)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
496.41k (x6.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
134.66k (x5.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
22.99k (x1.16)
TOTAL
173.2k
1241.12k (x7.17)

Performance/W
1600X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4