Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i7-3770K
Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-3770K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 124.3 k points while the i7-3770K gets 97.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 124.3 k points while the i7-3770K gets 97.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
306a9
Core
Summit Ridge
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2017
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
36.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
133.88k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
3.86k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
10.79k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.9k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
5.51k (x0.32)
TOTAL
45.06k
25.06k (x0.56)
Multithread
1600X
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
17.17k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
46.25k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
23.67k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
10.36k (x0.85)
TOTAL
124.3k
97.44k (x0.78)
Performance/W
1600X
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
223 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
813 points/W
601 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
1308 points/W
1265 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600X
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
988 points/GHz
990 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4591 points/GHz
2768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1256 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4338 points/GHz
1412 points/GHz
TOTAL
11265 points/GHz
6426 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4