| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
706e5
Core
Summit Ridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
4.05k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
15.29k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
9.04k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
10.54k (x0.61)
TOTAL
45.06k
38.92k (x0.86)

Multithread

1600X

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
9.05k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
33.88k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
15.34k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
6.74k (x0.55)
TOTAL
124.3k
65.01k (x0.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
25.53k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
19.99k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
9.31k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
10.81k (x0.68)
TOTAL
60.09k
65.64k (x1.09)

Multithread

1600X

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
58.46k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
57.31k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
20.1k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
6.81k (x0.34)
TOTAL
173.2k
142.69k (x0.82)

Performance/W
1600X
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4