| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600X is 1 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
706e5
Core
Summit Ridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
3.88k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
14.98k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
9.7k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
8.6k (x0.5)
TOTAL
45.06k
37.15k (x0.82)

Multithread

1600X

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
14.61k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
54.9k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
27.58k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
5.04k (x0.41)
TOTAL
124.3k
102.13k (x0.82)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
21.5k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
17.71k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
7.92k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
8.24k (x0.52)
TOTAL
60.09k
55.37k (x0.92)

Multithread

1600X

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
73.03k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
68.19k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
24.89k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
5.54k (x0.28)
TOTAL
173.2k
171.65k (x0.99)

Performance/W
1600X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4