| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
806ec
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
106.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
4.26k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
15.48k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.94k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
4.31k (x0.25)
TOTAL
45.06k
28.98k (x0.64)

Multithread

1600X

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
7.41k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
29.18k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
10.26k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
3.27k (x0.27)
TOTAL
124.3k
50.13k (x0.4)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
24.6k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
22.32k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
5.02k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
4.7k (x0.3)
TOTAL
60.09k
56.64k (x0.94)

Multithread

1600X

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
47.98k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
44.28k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
10.33k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
3.98k (x0.2)
TOTAL
173.2k
106.58k (x0.62)

Performance/W
1600X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
7105 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4