Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i3-10100
Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0653
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
22.74k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
20.31k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
4.71k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
7.65k (x0.48)
TOTAL
60.09k
55.41k (x0.92)
Multithread
1600X
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
71.95k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
67.7k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
16.43k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
6.25k (x0.31)
TOTAL
173.2k
162.33k (x0.94)
Performance/W
1600X
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600X
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4