Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
860f01
Core
Summit Ridge
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2017
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
14.87k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
21.53k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
8.39k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
8.21k (x0.52)
TOTAL
60.09k
53k (x0.88)
Multithread
1600X
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
124.63k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
158.62k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
69.79k (x2.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
7.53k (x0.38)
TOTAL
173.2k
360.57k (x2.08)
Performance/W
1600X
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600X
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4