| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 9 3900


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 4 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
870f10
Core
Summit Ridge
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
April 2017
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
687.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
4.39k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
16.99k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
7.74k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
24.57k (x1.42)
TOTAL
45.06k
53.69k (x1.19)

Multithread

1600X

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
48.45k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
230.81k (x2.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
122.82k (x7.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
54.73k (x4.47)
TOTAL
124.3k
456.8k (x3.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
16.85k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
26.03k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
9.54k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
22.55k (x1.42)
TOTAL
60.09k
74.97k (x1.25)

Multithread

1600X

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
229.41k (x4.71)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
292.81k (x3.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
128.48k (x5.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
36.8k (x1.85)
TOTAL
173.2k
687.5k (x3.97)

Performance/W
1600X
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
10577 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4