| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 2.5 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a50f00
Core
Summit Ridge
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2017
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
4.31k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
17.51k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
10.53k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
23.57k (x1.36)
TOTAL
45.06k
55.92k (x1.24)

Multithread

1600X

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
24.18k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
117.98k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
70.96k (x4.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
8.08k (x0.66)
TOTAL
124.3k
221.19k (x1.78)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
20.37k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
22.52k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
10.18k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
21.49k (x1.35)
TOTAL
60.09k
74.56k (x1.24)

Multithread

1600X

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
144.01k (x2.95)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
191.86k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
84.53k (x3.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
6.5k (x0.33)
TOTAL
173.2k
426.9k (x2.46)

Performance/W
1600X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4