| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 7 3800X


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800X is 2.9 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
870f10
Core
Summit Ridge
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
497.74k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
4.47k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
17.41k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
8.23k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
25.15k (x1.45)
TOTAL
45.06k
55.26k (x1.23)

Multithread

1600X

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
36.1k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
178.65k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
95.98k (x6.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
16.03k (x1.31)
TOTAL
124.3k
326.76k (x2.63)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
17.1k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
26.59k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
8.91k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
23.21k (x1.46)
TOTAL
60.09k
75.81k (x1.26)

Multithread

1600X

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
172.04k (x3.53)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
214.03k (x2.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
97.1k (x3.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
14.57k (x0.73)
TOTAL
173.2k
497.74k (x2.87)

Performance/W
1600X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
4740 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4