| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 2.5 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
800f82
Core
Summit Ridge
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
433.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
4.25k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
19.72k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.84k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
21.36k (x1.23)
TOTAL
45.06k
51.17k (x1.14)

Multithread

1600X

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
35.04k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
181.42k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
64.86k (x4.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
8.21k (x0.67)
TOTAL
124.3k
289.54k (x2.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
15.61k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
26.08k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
5.84k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
18.34k (x1.16)
TOTAL
60.09k
65.87k (x1.1)

Multithread

1600X

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
123.33k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
240.46k (x3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
61.23k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
8.17k (x0.41)
TOTAL
173.2k
433.19k (x2.5)

Performance/W
1600X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
4126 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4