| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs 5600X


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600X is 2.5 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a20f10
Core
Summit Ridge
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2017
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
86.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
435.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
23.28k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
25.58k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
11.72k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
25.45k (x1.6)
TOTAL
60.09k
86.03k (x1.43)

Multithread

1600X

5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
135.28k (x2.78)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
180.56k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
80.27k (x3.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
38.94k (x1.96)
TOTAL
173.2k
435.05k (x2.51)

Performance/W
1600X
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
599 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
6693 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
5061 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
2548 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
5533 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
18702 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4