| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs 4500U


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the 4500U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 4500U gets 194.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 4500U is 1.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
860f01
Core
Summit Ridge
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
52.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
194.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
15.37k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
23.02k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
7.74k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
6.32k (x0.4)
TOTAL
60.09k
52.44k (x0.87)

Multithread

1600X

4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
52.52k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
99.84k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
36.42k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
5.56k (x0.28)
TOTAL
173.2k
194.34k (x1.12)

Performance/W
1600X
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
3502 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
6656 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
2428 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
370 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
12956 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
3842 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1935 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
13111 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4