| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs 3400G


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.2 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
810f81
Core
Summit Ridge
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
200.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
14.58k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
23.98k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
5.35k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
6.34k (x0.4)
TOTAL
60.09k
50.25k (x0.84)

Multithread

1600X

3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
57.37k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
107.03k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
28.9k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
7.05k (x0.35)
TOTAL
173.2k
200.34k (x1.16)

Performance/W
1600X
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
3082 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4