| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 124.3 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600X is 2.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
100fa0
Core
Summit Ridge
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2017
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
1.98k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
4.57k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
2.57k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
3.51k (x0.2)
TOTAL
45.06k
12.64k (x0.28)

Multithread

1600X

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
11.86k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
27.4k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
15.39k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
3.46k (x0.28)
TOTAL
124.3k
58.11k (x0.47)

Performance/W
1600X
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
125 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
813 points/W
288 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
36 points/W
TOTAL
1308 points/W
612 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
988 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4591 points/GHz
1474 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4338 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
11265 points/GHz
4076 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4