| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i7-1165G7


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.2 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
806c1
Core
Summit Ridge
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
4.26k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
19.54k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
10.95k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
11.08k (x0.64)
TOTAL
45.06k
45.84k (x1.02)

Multithread

1600X

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
15.69k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
68.3k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
33.66k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
12.16k (x0.99)
TOTAL
124.3k
129.81k (x1.04)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
22.97k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
21.61k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
8.99k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
8.52k (x0.54)
TOTAL
60.09k
62.1k (x1.03)

Multithread

1600X

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
82.75k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
86.58k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
29.34k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
11.72k (x0.59)
TOTAL
173.2k
210.4k (x1.21)

Performance/W
1600X
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4