Ryzen 5 1600 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.4 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.4 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
50657
Core
Summit Ridge
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2017
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
12.92k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
10.97k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
2.54k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
5.09k (x0.3)
TOTAL
58.53k
31.52k (x0.54)
Multithread
1600
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
103.33k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
87.67k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
20.1k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
4.91k (x0.95)
TOTAL
303.4k
216.02k (x0.71)
Performance/W
1600
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4