Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i7-10510U
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
806ec
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
190.82k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
22.85k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
21.15k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
4.78k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
10.24k (x0.61)
TOTAL
58.53k
59.01k (x1.01)
Multithread
1600
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
86.08k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
79.78k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
18.26k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
6.69k (x1.3)
TOTAL
303.4k
190.82k (x0.63)
Performance/W
1600
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
5739 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
5319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
12721 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
4664 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
2089 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
12044 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4