Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i5-9500
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.2 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.2 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906ea
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2017
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
352.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
29.17k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
25.49k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
5.84k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
13.15k (x0.79)
TOTAL
58.53k
73.65k (x1.26)
Multithread
1600
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
166.66k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
146.9k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
34.04k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
5.25k (x1.02)
TOTAL
303.4k
352.84k (x1.16)
Performance/W
1600
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
5428 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4