| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i3-9100T


Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.6 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
906eb
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2017
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
192.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
24.89k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
21.82k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
4.83k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
8.63k (x0.52)
TOTAL
58.53k
60.16k (x1.03)

Multithread

1600

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
89.4k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
81.19k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
18.06k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
4.24k (x0.82)
TOTAL
303.4k
192.88k (x0.64)

Performance/W
1600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4