Ryzen 5 1600 vs 3550H
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.7 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.7 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
810f81
Core
Summit Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
178.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
13.51k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
22.34k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
4.98k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
4.24k (x0.25)
TOTAL
58.53k
45.07k (x0.77)
Multithread
1600
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
52.21k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
95.66k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
25.54k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
4.85k (x0.94)
TOTAL
303.4k
178.26k (x0.59)
Performance/W
1600
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
1492 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
2733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
730 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
5093 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
6038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
12182 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4