Ryzen 5 1600 vs 2400G
Description
Both models 1600 and 2400G are based on Zen architecture.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
810f10
Core
Summit Ridge
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
14.2k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
23.23k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
5.35k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
5.18k (x0.31)
TOTAL
58.53k
47.96k (x0.82)
Multithread
1600
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
58.24k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
105.72k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
28.73k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
5.59k (x1.08)
TOTAL
303.4k
198.27k (x0.65)
Performance/W
1600
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4