| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.8 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
810f81
Core
Summit Ridge
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
168.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
14.48k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
23.84k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
5.43k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
5.46k (x0.33)
TOTAL
58.53k
49.21k (x0.84)

Multithread

1600

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
54.39k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
88.77k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
20.04k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
5.48k (x1.06)
TOTAL
303.4k
168.69k (x0.56)

Performance/W
1600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4