| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i7-11800H


Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i7-11800H gets 607.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 2 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
806d1
Core
Summit Ridge
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
607.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
33.02k (x2.35)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
26.55k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
11.72k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
17.06k (x1.02)
TOTAL
58.53k
88.34k (x1.51)

Multithread

1600

i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
260.97k (x3.01)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
248.94k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
86.55k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
10.91k (x2.11)
TOTAL
303.4k
607.38k (x2)

Performance/W
1600
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
5799 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
5532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
1923 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
242 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
13497 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
7177 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
5771 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
3709 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
19204 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4