Ryzen 3 7320U vs N100
Description
The 7320U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7320U gets a score of 126.6 k points while the gets 92.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7320U is 1.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7320U gets a score of 126.6 k points while the gets 92.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7320U is 1.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
8a0f00
b06e0
Core
Mendocino
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT6
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
32k points
40.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
126.58k points
92.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.15k
16.04k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
10.58k
12.17k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
6.25k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.94k
5.74k (x2.96)
TOTAL
32k
40.2k (x1.26)
Multithread
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
59.68k
38k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
41.08k
34.92k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.61k
15.89k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
3.79k (x1.71)
TOTAL
126.58k
92.6k (x0.73)
Performance/W
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
3979 points/W
6333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2738 points/W
5820 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
147 points/W
632 points/W
TOTAL
8439 points/W
15433 points/W
Performance/GHz
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
3207 points/GHz
4718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2581 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1544 points/GHz
1838 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
472 points/GHz
1687 points/GHz
TOTAL
7804 points/GHz
11824 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4