| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3350U vs Core i7-9750H


Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.9 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ed
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
276.46k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
25.22k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
21.97k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
5.02k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
10.71k (x2.69)
TOTAL
43.7k
62.92k (x1.44)

Multithread

3350U

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
125.56k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
115.86k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
25.63k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
9.4k (x2.85)
TOTAL
144.84k
276.46k (x1.91)

Performance/W
3350U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
3350U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4