| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3350U vs Core i7-8565U


Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i7-8565U gets 142.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3350U is 1 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
806eb
Core
Picasso
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2019
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
67.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
142.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
27.2k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
23.47k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.91k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
12.25k (x3.08)
TOTAL
43.7k
67.83k (x1.55)

Multithread

3350U

i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
64.33k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
58.47k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
15.82k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
3.93k (x1.19)
TOTAL
144.84k
142.55k (x0.98)

Performance/W
3350U
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
4288 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
3898 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
1055 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
262 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
9503 points/W

Performance/GHz
3350U
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
5103 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1067 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
2663 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
14746 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4