| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3350U vs Core i7-6500U


Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-6500U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i7-6500U gets 97.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.5 times faster than the i7-6500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
406e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
March 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
46.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
97.52k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
19.47k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
17.58k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.05k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
5.15k (x1.29)
TOTAL
43.7k
46.25k (x1.06)

Multithread

3350U

i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
42.05k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
40.2k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
9.4k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
5.86k (x1.78)
TOTAL
144.84k
97.52k (x0.67)

Performance/W
3350U
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
2803 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
2680 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
626 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
391 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
6501 points/W

Performance/GHz
3350U
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
6279 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
5672 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1305 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
1662 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
14918 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4