Ryzen 3 3350U vs Core i5-1035G1
Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.2 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.2 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
706e5
Core
Picasso
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
171.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
21.5k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
17.71k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
7.92k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
8.24k (x2.07)
TOTAL
43.7k
55.37k (x1.27)
Multithread
3350U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
73.03k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
68.19k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
24.89k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
5.54k (x1.68)
TOTAL
144.84k
171.65k (x1.19)
Performance/W
3350U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
11443 points/W
Performance/GHz
3350U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4