| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3350U vs Core i3-7100U


Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i3-7100U gets 79.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.8 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
79.6k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
13.46k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
13.45k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
3.08k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.4k (x0.85)
TOTAL
43.7k
33.38k (x0.76)

Multithread

3350U

i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
34.95k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
33.53k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
7.74k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
3.38k (x1.02)
TOTAL
144.84k
79.6k (x0.55)

Performance/W
3350U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
2330 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
2235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
5307 points/W

Performance/GHz
3350U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
1415 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
13909 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4