Ryzen 3 3350U vs Core i3-7100
Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i3-7100 gets 124.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i3-7100 gets 124.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
57.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
124.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
25.53k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
22.98k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
5.37k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.97k (x1)
TOTAL
43.7k
57.86k (x1.32)
Multithread
3350U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
54.73k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
53.55k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
12.93k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
3.6k (x1.09)
TOTAL
144.84k
124.8k (x0.86)
Performance/W
3350U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
1050 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
254 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
2447 points/W
Performance/GHz
3350U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
6547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
5893 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
14836 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4