Ryzen 3 3350U vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.5 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.5 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
860f01
Core
Picasso
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2019
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
14.87k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
21.53k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
8.39k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
8.21k (x2.06)
TOTAL
43.7k
53k (x1.21)
Multithread
3350U
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
124.63k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
158.62k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
69.79k (x4.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
7.53k (x2.28)
TOTAL
144.84k
360.57k (x2.49)
Performance/W
3350U
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
3350U
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4