Ryzen 3 3350U vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Description
Both models 3350U and 3750H are based on Zen+ architecture.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.2 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.2 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f81
Core
Picasso
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
175.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
13.72k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
22.93k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.99k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
5.27k (x1.32)
TOTAL
43.7k
46.91k (x1.07)
Multithread
3350U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
50.54k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
93.33k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
25.25k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
6.07k (x1.84)
TOTAL
144.84k
175.18k (x1.21)
Performance/W
3350U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
5005 points/W
Performance/GHz
3350U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4