| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3350U vs Ryzen 5 1600


Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.9 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f11
Core
Picasso
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
272.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
13.67k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
22.28k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.99k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
15.22k (x3.82)
TOTAL
43.7k
56.16k (x1.29)

Multithread

3350U

1600
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
81.03k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
145.84k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
39.14k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
6.79k (x2.06)
TOTAL
144.84k
272.8k (x1.88)

Performance/W
3350U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
4197 points/W

Performance/GHz
3350U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4