Ryzen 3 3350U vs 2200U
Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f10
Core
Picasso
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
71.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
10.73k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
18.15k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
3.99k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.89k (x0.98)
TOTAL
43.7k
36.77k (x0.84)
Multithread
3350U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
20.11k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
36.87k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
10.74k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
3.31k (x1)
TOTAL
144.84k
71.02k (x0.49)
Performance/W
3350U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
3350U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4