Ryzen 3 3350U vs A8 9600
Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 9600 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the 9600 gets 92.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.6 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the 9600 gets 92.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.6 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
660f51
Core
Picasso
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
32.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
92.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
11.66k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
14.96k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
3.33k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
2.8k (x0.7)
TOTAL
43.7k
32.75k (x0.75)
Multithread
3350U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
38.61k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
38.92k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
11.57k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
3.43k (x1.04)
TOTAL
144.84k
92.52k (x0.64)
Performance/W
3350U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
594 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
599 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
178 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
1423 points/W
Performance/GHz
3350U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
3429 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
4400 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
979 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
824 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
9632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4