Ryzen 3 3250U vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The 3250U is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 5.8 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 5.8 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306f2
Core
Dali
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
33.26k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
77.88k points
452.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3250U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
9.33k
18.62k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
17.1k
10.49k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
4.04k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
3.26k (x1)
TOTAL
33.26k
36.41k (x1.09)
Multithread
3250U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.14k
236.25k (x10.67)
Test#2 (FP)
40.04k
151.05k (x3.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
58.9k (x5.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
6.7k (x1.34)
TOTAL
77.88k
452.9k (x5.82)
Performance/W
3250U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1476 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2669 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5192 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
3250U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2667 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4886 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
932 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
9503 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4