Ryzen 3 3250U vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The 3250U is based on Zen architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.8 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.8 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
50657
Core
Dali
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2020
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
33.26k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
77.88k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3250U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
9.33k
12.92k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
17.1k
10.97k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
2.54k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
5.09k (x1.56)
TOTAL
33.26k
31.52k (x0.95)
Multithread
3250U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
22.14k
103.33k (x4.67)
Test#2 (FP)
40.04k
87.67k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
20.1k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
4.91k (x0.98)
TOTAL
77.88k
216.02k (x2.77)
Performance/W
3250U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1476 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2669 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
5192 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
3250U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2667 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4886 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
932 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
9503 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4