Ryzen 3 3250U vs Core i5-8265U
Description
The 3250U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.8 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.8 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ec
Core
Dali
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
33.26k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
77.88k points
143.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3250U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.33k
19.19k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
17.1k
17.47k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
4.04k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
5.97k (x1.83)
TOTAL
33.26k
46.67k (x1.4)
Multithread
3250U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.14k
64.43k (x2.91)
Test#2 (FP)
40.04k
61.91k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
13.36k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
3.52k (x0.7)
TOTAL
77.88k
143.23k (x1.84)
Performance/W
3250U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
1476 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2669 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
5192 points/W
9548 points/W
Performance/GHz
3250U
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
2667 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4886 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
932 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
9503 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4