| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3250U vs Core i5-7400T


Description
The 3250U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-7400T is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the i5-7400T gets 163.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7400T is 2.1 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Dali
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
33.26k points
49.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
77.88k points
163.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3250U
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.33k
19.7k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
17.1k
17.29k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
4.07k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
8.1k (x2.48)
TOTAL
33.26k
49.16k (x1.48)

Multithread

3250U

i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.14k
75.27k (x3.4)
Test#2 (FP)
40.04k
66.24k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
13.93k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
7.95k (x1.59)
TOTAL
77.88k
163.4k (x2.1)

Performance/W
3250U
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1476 points/W
2151 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2669 points/W
1893 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
398 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
5192 points/W
4669 points/W

Performance/GHz
3250U
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2667 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4886 points/GHz
5764 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/GHz
1356 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
932 points/GHz
2700 points/GHz
TOTAL
9503 points/GHz
16388 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4