Ryzen 3 3250U vs Core i3-6100T
Description
The 3250U is based on Zen architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the i3-6100T gets 105.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.4 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the i3-6100T gets 105.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.4 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e3
Core
Dali
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2020
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
33.26k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
77.88k points
105.21k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3250U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.33k
19.58k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.1k
16.97k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
3.91k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
3.47k (x1.06)
TOTAL
33.26k
43.92k (x1.32)
Multithread
3250U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.14k
47.02k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
40.04k
44.41k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
9.93k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
3.85k (x0.77)
TOTAL
77.88k
105.21k (x1.35)
Performance/W
3250U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1476 points/W
1344 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2669 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
284 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
5192 points/W
3006 points/W
Performance/GHz
3250U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2667 points/GHz
6119 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4886 points/GHz
5303 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
932 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
9503 points/GHz
13726 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4