Ryzen 3 3250U vs Core i3-10110U
Description
The 3250U is based on Zen architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.4 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.4 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ec
Core
Dali
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
33.26k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
77.88k points
106.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3250U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.33k
24.6k (x2.64)
Test#2 (FP)
17.1k
22.32k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
5.02k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
4.7k (x1.44)
TOTAL
33.26k
56.64k (x1.7)
Multithread
3250U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.14k
47.98k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
40.04k
44.28k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
10.33k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
3.98k (x0.8)
TOTAL
77.88k
106.58k (x1.37)
Performance/W
3250U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1476 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2669 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
5192 points/W
7105 points/W
Performance/GHz
3250U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2667 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4886 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
932 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
9503 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4