Ryzen 3 3250U vs N150
Description
The 3250U is based on Zen architecture while the is based on Gracemont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 69.5 k points while the gets 112.7 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.6 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 69.5 k points while the gets 112.7 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.6 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
b06e0
Core
Dali
Twin Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2025
Mean monothread perf.
30.28k points
36.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.45k points
112.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.3k
14.42k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
15.24k
11.18k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
5.68k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
5.25k (x1.55)
TOTAL
30.28k
36.54k (x1.21)
Multithread
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.36k
50.39k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
36.56k
37.69k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
20.09k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
4.53k (x1.05)
TOTAL
69.45k
112.69k (x1.62)
Performance/W
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1291 points/W
8398 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2437 points/W
6282 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
616 points/W
3348 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
755 points/W
TOTAL
4630 points/W
18782 points/W
Performance/GHz
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
2372 points/GHz
4006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4353 points/GHz
3106 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
969 points/GHz
1459 points/GHz
TOTAL
8652 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4